Who should have ended Goldberg's Streak? - Page 5 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #41 of 144 (permalink) Old 05-16-2012, 05:10 PM
Little Poppa Pump
 
Phil_Mc_90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,464
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                   
Re: who should have ended Goldberg's Streak?

Scott Steiner, pushed as a monster heel. Would have set up an unmissable rematch - can Goldberg overcome the only man to ever beat him

Phil_Mc_90 is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #42 of 144 (permalink) Old 05-16-2012, 05:34 PM
Asking Meltzer to rate my matches
 
JuviJuiceIsLoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: who should have ended Goldberg's Streak?

I think either Scott Steiner, Bret Hart, or Chris Benoit.

Somebody with a submission hold that could knock Goldberg out with a weapon of some sort, then slap on the hold.

I don't think Goldberg should lose clean.

JuviJuiceIsLoose is offline  
post #43 of 144 (permalink) Old 05-16-2012, 05:47 PM
Learning to break kayfabe
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 242
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
     
Re: who should have ended Goldberg's Streak?

DDP or Jericho . . although I thought it would've been cool if they never ended the streak, then stuff like Goldberg vs Taker for the streak or vs Lesnar for his streak if they never let him lose would've been much more awesome. I can't remember the last time they did a streak vs streak match which I think could be a huge draw with the right people. I mean, look how big Ali vs Frazier was.
coconutcrusher is offline  
post #44 of 144 (permalink) Old 05-16-2012, 06:30 PM
Still Real To Me, Dammit!
 
Nerveshatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: who should have ended Goldberg's Streak?

alex wright
Nerveshatter is offline  
post #45 of 144 (permalink) Old 05-16-2012, 06:54 PM
Humbled
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,704
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: who should have ended Goldberg's Streak?

Chris Jericho.
Those who watched the segments between Goldberg and Jericho during that time know what a shock it would be if Jericho of all people would be the one who defeated Greenberg
DualShock is offline  
post #46 of 144 (permalink) Old 05-16-2012, 07:12 PM
The One Who Knocks
 
Cynic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 5,341
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: who should have ended Goldberg's Streak?

Before I give my answer, I'd like to offer my take on some of the names suggested thus far and why they would've been poor choices.

DDP - Too old. DDP was 42 years old in 1998. Ending Goldberg's streak could have made an instant main eventer - which Nash already was - and even though DDP was over as hell, there wasn't much of a future with him (this is of course working under the assumption that if you were booking WCW in 1998 you didn't have a time machine to predict the company would be dead in three years).

Jericho - Should he have had a feud with Goldberg? Absolutely. The months of segments of Jericho mocking Goldberg on his own were television gold; it's sad to think about how much entertainment we were deprived by the Goldberg/Jericho feud never happening in WCW. But, end the streak? No way. He could have never won clean in any believable fashion. And even though a chickenshit heel victory would've been great for Jericho - and certainly a better alternative to what they did with Nash - I'd still consider a waste of what they'd built with Goldberg.

Sting - Sting shouldn't have beaten Goldberg for the same reason that Triple H shouldn't have (and didn't) end Undertaker's streak: he just didn't need it. Sting couldn't have been any bigger of a star than he already was in 1998. Hell, he was on the decline at that point; 1997 was his career apex, which is amusing considering he only had one match all year. There was no long term, or really even short term, upside to Sting beating Goldberg.

Benoit - Of all the names I'm listing here, I'd consider Benoit to have been the best choice of the lot, even though I wouldn't have had him end the streak either. The guy who beat Goldberg needed to be someone who could be a top star, and Benoit just wasn't that guy. He lacked the charisma and the presence to be a main eventer in 1998, and even though I think he's the greatest technical wrestler ever, I feel that was true of his entire career.

Bret Hart - See Sting.

So, who would I have had end it?

It almost shocks myself that I'm saying this, because I was never really a fan of the guy at all - well, except for making fun of his oftentimes incomprehensible promos - but I think it's the best possible conclusion:

Scott Steiner.

He had everything WCW needed at that point. He already had the name recognition from all the success of the Steiner Brothers. He had the talent. He had the charisma. God knows he had the look. A competently booked WCW moving into the 21st century with Goldberg as the top babyface and Steiner as the top heel would have had a lot of potential going up against all the zaniness of the WWF. There is no one else in WCW at that time who was a better choice to beat Goldberg than Steiner, and I was never even a fan of the guy.

Cynic is offline  
post #47 of 144 (permalink) Old 05-16-2012, 07:17 PM
Still Real To Me, Dammit!
 
Nerveshatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: who should have ended Goldberg's Streak?

Norman Smiley with the upset
Nerveshatter is offline  
post #48 of 144 (permalink) Old 05-16-2012, 07:25 PM
A superhero that saves your GF from your sex game.
 
Dark Kent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 3,830
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: who should have ended Goldberg's Streak?

Im sorry but Im gonna be biased as hell. DDP should've beaten that streak. It would've solidified him as a true legend. Not only that he would've done it as a face. I HATED that he finally won it as a damn heel, that moment was taken away from the fans to enjoy it with him.

Dark Kent is offline  
post #49 of 144 (permalink) Old 05-16-2012, 07:42 PM
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
Psycho Mantis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Commander's Room
Posts: 361
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
   
Re: who should have ended Goldberg's Streak?

Interesting question.

1998 so DDP is a good choice, perhaps even someone like Raven. Basically someone who had momentum and was just outside of the main event scene.

Although, I think Goldberg should have been unbeaten until Starrcade 99.
Psycho Mantis is offline  
post #50 of 144 (permalink) Old 05-16-2012, 07:59 PM Thread Starter
Lacing SCOTT STEINER's boots
 
jonoaries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 555 Centaur Dr.
Posts: 4,305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: who should have ended Goldberg's Streak?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynic View Post
Before I give my answer, I'd like to offer my take on some of the names suggested thus far and why they would've been poor choices.

DDP - Too old. DDP was 42 years old in 1998. Ending Goldberg's streak could have made an instant main eventer - which Nash already was - and even though DDP was over as hell, there wasn't much of a future with him (this is of course working under the assumption that if you were booking WCW in 1998 you didn't have a time machine to predict the company would be dead in three years).

Jericho - Should he have had a feud with Goldberg? Absolutely. The months of segments of Jericho mocking Goldberg on his own were television gold; it's sad to think about how much entertainment we were deprived by the Goldberg/Jericho feud never happening in WCW. But, end the streak? No way. He could have never won clean in any believable fashion. And even though a chickenshit heel victory would've been great for Jericho - and certainly a better alternative to what they did with Nash - I'd still consider a waste of what they'd built with Goldberg.

Sting - Sting shouldn't have beaten Goldberg for the same reason that Triple H shouldn't have (and didn't) end Undertaker's streak: he just didn't need it. Sting couldn't have been any bigger of a star than he already was in 1998. Hell, he was on the decline at that point; 1997 was his career apex, which is amusing considering he only had one match all year. There was no long term, or really even short term, upside to Sting beating Goldberg.

Benoit - Of all the names I'm listing here, I'd consider Benoit to have been the best choice of the lot, even though I wouldn't have had him end the streak either. The guy who beat Goldberg needed to be someone who could be a top star, and Benoit just wasn't that guy. He lacked the charisma and the presence to be a main eventer in 1998, and even though I think he's the greatest technical wrestler ever, I feel that was true of his entire career.

Bret Hart - See Sting.

So, who would I have had end it?

It almost shocks myself that I'm saying this, because I was never really a fan of the guy at all - well, except for making fun of his oftentimes incomprehensible promos - but I think it's the best possible conclusion:

Scott Steiner.

He had everything WCW needed at that point. He already had the name recognition from all the success of the Steiner Brothers. He had the talent. He had the charisma. God knows he had the look. A competently booked WCW moving into the 21st century with Goldberg as the top babyface and Steiner as the top heel would have had a lot of potential going up against all the zaniness of the WWF. There is no one else in WCW at that time who was a better choice to beat Goldberg than Steiner, and I was never even a fan of the guy.
I really hadn't considered DDP's age until you mentioned it. He just didn't seem that old so I think they could gotten away with it but Steiner is a great choice. He had the size, presence, look and ability to do it, he could carry the promos and it would have been somewhat believeable. So I can't really argue against Steiner. Its a great choice.
jonoaries is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome