The thread title isw who was BETTER in WCW than WWF, that leaves A LOT to debate. Far and away (for me) Jarrett was far better in WWF. He left because he wasn't getting pushed, and yet he wins the WCW title twice when David Arquette and Vince Russo got the belt...if he won it in 96 when he FIRST went to WCW, I would actually agree with you.
For the sake of being consistent with your logic, I hope to God you're not one of those people that complain in threads about somebody not getting a push because if you are, that contradicts everything you're saying now.
As for the bold, save that bullshit because you just want on a rant about the WCW World Title having no value. So, I guess the belt lost value when either Hogan, Luger, Sting, Savage, Goldberg, Nash, Flair, DDP, Bret, Benoit or Sid held it? Did it lose value because of Sid, Bret or DDP?
I stand by what I say. Jarrett was better in WCW. In terms of booking (he got a push), my personal perception (he came off as a main event guy, although I didn't like him) and, from the way it seems, his own personal enjoyment (based on the above; got a push and perceived as a main eventer; 2 things he never got in WWF or anywhere else outside of his daddy).