Had this story included a source, I would not have made that comment. You've been around here long enough, I'm sure you're familiar with posters who make bullshit threads by now. Without a source, it's just heresey. But I see there is a source now.
And no, there is nothing funny about a little girl being thrown off a bridge at all.
That's the best you've got? You ask for nudes of a dead 5 year old because there wasn't a source?
Here you are trying to play the victim in all of this when you were the one would posted a little "joke". Yeah, we're all laughing. Maybe if you'd think before posting you may have saved yourself the ban. sexual satisfaction? There you go again. I don't enjoy banning, but I would be very careful if I were you.
Some people in this world are fucking disgusting. Whether a thread has a link or not, it's sick to even think the situation in general deserves some kind of arrogant fucking comment.
Which situation? The supposed murder of a young girl.... or some n00b likely making up a false story to solicite reactions from gullible posters? The latter definitely deserves an arrogant remark. Everyone thought it was funny as fucking hell when Hannah Hardy got busted. YOU even threw in your 2 cents.
And clearly I was wrong it was indeed a legit story. But again, that was not my perspective at the time.
It's actually quite laughable that anyone would even assume I was serious about that comment, especially for anyone who reads anything else I post around here. My sense of humor is admitedly not exactly PG, but "sick" I am not. You would think any moron who has read 2 threads in the News section would understand the importance of stating a source.
Considering I haven't banned anyone in months you're talking shit.
I've heard that it was you who gave me my last ban, and considering the things you have banned people for it the past I was inclined to believe you would ban me over something so juvenile as calling somebody a faggot.