Thread Tools

**~Fallen Angel~** · 03-05-2009, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sticksy

Yes but if you're getting articles and whatnot, and just re-wording & citing it then you're really not doing anything yourself.

No no,I know that.You obviously have to make a statement and convince the readers that you know what you're talking about.But if you're asked to write a paper on a Sociologist or a Philosopher,there's nothing wrong with re-wording what they say with citations or directly quoting them.I've written a lot of research papers and those especially require a lot of citing.

**Blasko** · 03-05-2009, 07:33 PM

Reason why Muta is usually shitted on is repetitive ring work.

DRAGONSCREWDRAGONSCREWMOONSALTSHININGWIZARD2COUNTFIGUREFOURROPEBREAKMOONSALT.

**ItsWhatIdo** · 03-05-2009, 07:36 PM

Who cares about citing. Go to school to be some sort of scientist, make experiments, and quote your own work. Then you don't have to worry about it.

**EGame** · 03-05-2009, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Fallen Angel~

Yes but re-wording someone's work and using citations is not considered plargiarism.That's what you're supposed to do.

Incorrect, rewording what's stated in a document in still plagiarism even if you give credit.

You are supposed to rewrite the information that you've obtained applied to your current knowledge in the area of studied research and then give credit. I'm in the field of science, an area plagiarizing is all too common in. I find it shocking that people would even consider using Wikipedia as a source, if you cite it in your paper as a source, you can proclaim yourself as being academically suicidal.

Es. · 03-05-2009, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WCW

It's actually b/c it's a rant that's focused and trying to make a point and isn't a rant about nothing that can easily be taken off topic like 99% of the rants on here.

My reason was more of an understatement. I was nice not having them around though.

**KingKicks** · 03-05-2009, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -TheMercuryEnigma-

Meh fair enough, You made your rant, she explained herself, everyone goes away happy...maybe with a slight bruised ego.

Not until you make a new sig with Jeff's face on Hannah's body. Then she truly will be Hannah Hardy

.

**Hanz** · 03-05-2009, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benjo™

Not until you make a new sig with Jeff's face on Hannah's body. Then she truly will be Hannah Hardy

.

....oh god no.

**Rush** · 03-05-2009, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EGame

Incorrect, rewording what's stated in a document in still plagiarism even if you give credit.

You are supposed to rewrite the information that you've obtained applied to your current knowledge in the area of studied research and then give credit. I'm in the field of science, an area plagiarizing is all too common in. I find it shocking that people would even consider using Wikipedia as a source, if you cite it in your paper as a source, you can proclaim yourself as being academically suicidal.

Exactly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hannah Hardy

....oh god no.

Hai Hannah, you know that you'd love it

Spiked. · 03-05-2009, 07:40 PM

Didn't someone say Hannah's youtube page was youtube.com/hannahleo27? That name seemed familiar to me so I searched....

http://www.wrestlingforum.com/178788-drivebyleo.html

This guy's name use to be 27leo27. Just saying.

RussellJones · 03-05-2009, 07:41 PM

I personally could care less if you plagiarize, but I fail to see the connection between cheating on a test, which I agree everyone has probably done, and copy and pasting something from yahoo answers to impress guys in a Japanese wrestling forum.