 |
|
07-07-2008, 05:21 PM
|
#141 (permalink)
|
|
The Artist Formerly Known As Alcoholic
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 3,674
|
Re: BTB Discussion Thread - July 2008
It's easy to find on Wikipedia.
God damn, learn to research a bit, for the love of...
__________________
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
07-07-2008, 08:30 PM
|
#142 (permalink)
|
|
Dying In CZW
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 561
|
Re: BTB Discussion Thread - July 2008
Yeah its really not hard to find out info like that, wiki is your friend.
Okay, today's current BTB idea is wanting to do a one brand WWE BTB, the RAW brand inparticular, but am wondering exactly what way of doing so is best, as in how to deal with only RAW and not Smackdown (as would be in 04 time), as really cany be arsed to write/book two brands, help me.
__________________
Review For Review Isn't A Theory I Concur With. Only Review If You Are Actually Interested In The BTB, Otherwise Its Pointless IMO.
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 05:08 AM
|
#143 (permalink)
|
|
The Artist Formerly Known As Alcoholic
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 3,674
|
Re: BTB Discussion Thread - July 2008
I'd say recap the Smackdown side of things monthly in a brief fashion. Even at PPVs, briefly recapping the Smackdown side of things, while writing out the Raw side of things in full, or in much more detailed recap-style.
__________________
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 05:50 AM
|
#144 (permalink)
|
|
Jumping Off Roofs
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 222
|
Re: BTB Discussion Thread - July 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by berrysi
Yeah its really not hard to find out info like that, wiki is your friend.
Okay, today's current BTB idea is wanting to do a one brand WWE BTB, the RAW brand inparticular, but am wondering exactly what way of doing so is best, as in how to deal with only RAW and not Smackdown (as would be in 04 time), as really cany be arsed to write/book two brands, help me.
|
Well back then each brand had their own PPV's right? If so, then I say just ignore the Smackdown! side altogether.
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 12:01 PM
|
#145 (permalink)
|
|
All hail the Morrison Superkick~
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Lane
Posts: 892
|
Re: BTB Discussion Thread - July 2008
I think it's good to have a update of rosters, champions etc. every month after a PPV, opinions on this? A good idea? I think it helps new readers, easier for them to get involved/read.
__________________
---

|KingCrash|
Be The Booker
SmackDown is up, R4R!
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 12:03 PM
|
#146 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: England
Posts: 3,100
|
Re: BTB Discussion Thread - July 2008
Yeah I don't see why not.
You could always post it with the PPV news & notes, if you do them.
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 12:03 PM
|
#147 (permalink)
|
|
The Artist Formerly Known As Alcoholic
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 3,674
|
Re: BTB Discussion Thread - July 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD SPUR
I think it's good to have a update of rosters, champions etc. every month after a PPV, opinions on this? A good idea? I think it helps new readers, easier for them to get involved/read.
|
That, or refer them to the first page every once in a while, and of course, update that first post frequently.
__________________
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 12:04 PM
|
#148 (permalink)
|
|
All hail the Morrison Superkick~
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Lane
Posts: 892
|
Re: BTB Discussion Thread - July 2008
Yeah, I was thinking more of the update things Sumzi used to do, rather than the first post but I guess that works just as well.
__________________
---

|KingCrash|
Be The Booker
SmackDown is up, R4R!
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 12:06 PM
|
#149 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Wales
Posts: 461
|
Re: BTB Discussion Thread - July 2008
Yeah, as Alcoholic said just do it on the front page, because most new readers to the BTB will look there first.
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 04:06 PM
|
#150 (permalink)
|
|
Dying In CZW
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 561
|
Re: BTB Discussion Thread - July 2008
Please please please can peeps refrain from thinking that updating the first post with current time BTB info as the way to go, cause its really stupid if thought about for longer than a second. I used to do it but then saw the error in my ways when reading other peeps BTB's, because not every reader will be up to date in your BTB and might want to start reading from the beginning, which should have the info for that actual starting point, not the info for 5, 6, 7 months down the line, it doesn't give the info needed for start of BTB and spoils majority of BTB through the fact you know stuff before its occurred. [/rantover]
__________________
Review For Review Isn't A Theory I Concur With. Only Review If You Are Actually Interested In The BTB, Otherwise Its Pointless IMO.
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|