Thread Tools

Lashley™ · 05-26-2008, 01:40 PM

Entertainment to keep me enjoying it and wanting more.

**JayDeeSpur** · 05-26-2008, 03:55 PM

Just some general questions:

Do you think it would be okay to say someone has been suspended and to have them drop thier title or Money In The Bank case if you wanted to make a new feud or not have any ideas for them?

&

Whats the longest would you have a World Championship be held? I say no longer than one year? How long would you go for?

**Jamie1** · 05-26-2008, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD SPUR

Just some general questions:

Do you think it would be okay to say someone has been suspended and to have them drop thier title or Money In The Bank case if you wanted to make a new feud or not have any ideas for them?

&

Whats the longest would you have a World Championship be held? I say no longer than one year? How long would you go for?

To answer your first question. I don't know why you couldn't do that. I would just say he has been injured and then have the GM come out and say therefore he has been stripped of his championship. I wouldn't just start a new feud without explaning why the MITB or Title was took away from the superstar.

To answer your second question. I would say 1 year also all though i think that may even be too much unless its a very solid wrestler and you can bring up fresh feuds with him all the time. Then i would not bother as much

kid o mac · 05-26-2008, 04:07 PM

As far as the World Championship reign question goes, it depends on how well you can book the wrestler with the title during the reign. Along as the champion has enough momentum and heat to carry a feud or a good match, you should keep the title on him as long as you want. In my thread, I had King Booker be the WWE Champion for ten months, WrestleMania 22 in March 2006 to the 2007 Royal Rumble, with him losing the title to Christian, who won the MITB back at Mania 22. Once again, it all depends on how you book the champion and the feuds that he is involved in while champion.

**Antgreen** · 05-26-2008, 04:50 PM

For the championship reign, I would have maybe a year, maybe a bit shorter. Because I think people would lose interest in it as the championship matches would be predictible.

Emperor DC · 05-26-2008, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by greenstuff99

For the championship reign, I would have maybe a year, maybe a bit shorter. Because I think people would lose interest in it as the championship matches would be predictible.

That is quite frankly bullshit.

Year old reigns and beyond can be entertaining. Just because some of the matches would be predictable, that does not mean what happens in between those matches would not capture the imagination. There are various twists and turns you could make to give the reign a more entertaining edge.

But, it means thinking outside the box and myself, I only know a handful of people that could make that sort of reign work with thier creative minds. You do need a very creative mind, and an expansive mind to do it.

**Antgreen** · 05-26-2008, 04:58 PM

There you go again!

**Aerts** · 05-26-2008, 05:15 PM

Keep to BTB, Greenstuff.

Lashley™ · 05-26-2008, 05:37 PM

Yay or Nay to making a stable on ECW to try and give it some credibility?

WCW Rules · 05-26-2008, 05:53 PM

Yay? Stables are always great, especially when someone books 'em right. Give it the go ahead; no one's stopping you.