As I said glass shatters what other society in the world feel they need guns to feel safe out in public? It must be a very sad one because it's not normal that's for sure.
Why don't YOU Google it? Stop asking me to do your work for you. Every single one of your "points" has been absolute shit. You're just throwing out bullshit when the actual stats say otherwise. Like I said previously - you're full of shit. It might be time for a colon flush.
For the rest of your pro gun propaganda if crime rates are going down why do you need to Carry guns in suburbs.
Propaganda? You do know the actual definition of the word, right? Official FBI statistics are not propaganda. Take the hint: you can throw out all of the walls of text you want at me, but just typing a whole bunch of bullshit that is completely devoid of fact is doing nothing to prove your point and is simply making you look clueless.
Gun crimes happen everywhere, not just in ghettoes, though you'd probably like that. Why wouldn't one need a gun in the suburbs? You tell me WHY YOU WOULDN'T NEED ONE.
You then go on about 1/131 citizens have chance of being involved in violent crime, kind of contradictory statement isn't it?
Look at the context it was used in, dweeb. The context being IN NEW ORLEANS. Followed by a NATIONWIDE crime statistic of the lowest murder rate in 50 years. Are you mentally handicapped or something? And you have the gall to throw stones at the American education system?
And of course less guns means less chance of them being used as I said simple maths.
No, what you said was "less guns = less killings". Don't go twisting your shit around buddy, you already look like a Keystone Cop. The simple math of there being MILLIONS of more guns now than there were 49 years ago and the homicide rate being lower than that time is all the "simple math" you need. To further break this down for you:
Gun ownership 49 years ago: Less than it is now
Homicide rate 49 years ago: More than it is now
Gun ownership today: WAY, WAY more than it was then
Homicide rate 49 years ago: Less than it was then
More guns really doesn't mean less killing, now does it? Unfortunately your "simple math" is not so simple for you, is it?
More guns doesn't mean less crime because how can you prove they are being used as a deterent, less guns or hey here's a concept no guns and the place is a hell of a lot better.
You are as thick as pig shit.
You implied I and others were calling you a redneck which is what I was answering back to you about and i stand by you being that typical American the rest of the world laughs at.
No, you did not imply anything about someone being a redneck. I told you I was replying to KWH who implied that only rednecks carry guns in public. I replied to him saying that I carried a gun, and you said it wasn't necessary. In no way, shape, or form did I imply that you said anything of the sort, and I only mentioned it in a post towards you to hammer a knowledge nail into that unoccupied cranium of yours when you got butt hurt and defensive as if I said YOU called someone a redneck. I merely said that I was replying to KWH's post that you replied to in the context of only rednecks carrying guns.
Do you want to buy a clue?
Go have a wank because you seem to be slightly uptight I guess your sisters unavailable!
Did I not say a few posts ago that personal insults are the go-to defense when people are made to look like a dipshit over this issue?