Thread Tools

**Trigger** · 11-25-2012, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Arseache Kid

So they want to leave the EU which would have devastating affects on the economy, they want to repeal the Human Rights Act which essentially protects you from police brutality, gives you freedom of speech and expression amongst other things and they want to ban anything that isn't considered "British culture" (anything that's not white or middle class).

But yeah, logical, reasonable ideas that are in no way the thoughts of thick cunts.

I don't understand why the kids were given to them in the first place. Did they not check their political views when vetting them?

As far as I was aware you aren't allowed to ask people about their political views when it comes to fostering.

Quote:

Originally Posted by greendayedgehead

So you've got three non white kids living with parents that think multiculturalism is terrible. Yup, makes sense.

The foster parents said they were encouraged to speak their own language and were put into a school that was populated by a large proportion of their denomination.

If they are going to look after the kids, who gives a shit what their political views are.

**Panther** · 11-26-2012, 02:51 AM

Nothing wrong with immigration limits. A country can only take so much of an immigrant surge at once.

Cliffy Byro · 11-26-2012, 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Arseache Kid

Well it actually does because Britain doesn't actually have an immigration problem. Lots of countries take in more immigrants than ourselves and the rate of immigration is actually falling. "Immigrants" are just a catch all for what they really mean, non-white people. Non-white middle class people to be more exact.

And the last sentence is obviously racist. So much that you had to ackowledge it as being 'dodgy' when defending them.

And what are these reasons for leaving the EU?

Christ you sound like Diane Abbott.

Anyways the majority of Britain feels the way UKIP do about this country.

The three main parties are fucking incompetent.

Evil Neville · 11-26-2012, 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRITLAND

There are 3 Big Parties these include:
- Conservative: Party controlling UK right now, UK version of Republican Party, Only Support Rich People

- Labour: UK version of Democrats, Support the Poor

- Liberal Democrats: Party which wants to do things which are right eg Human Rights etc, Support kinda in the middle of classes

You also have small minor parties like
- Green Party: ECO party, also in USA
- UKIP: Want to leave EU
- BNP: Racist, Communist Party, Not right in the head

LoL what they are far-right fascists.

**Karma101** · 11-26-2012, 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roadkill_

LOL. Britain doesn't have an immigration problem? Look at this video, a typical English street. It looks to me like it is 80% non-indigenous;

I bet I could find a video of a street in England where there were mostly white people on it as well.

**i$e** · 11-26-2012, 08:59 AM

UKIP are dumb as fuck.

Swark · 11-26-2012, 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRITLAND

There are 3 Big Parties these include:
- Conservative: Party controlling UK right now, UK version of Republican Party, Only Support Rich People

- Labour: UK version of Democrats, Support the Poor

- Liberal Democrats: Party which wants to do things which are right eg Human Rights etc, Support kinda in the middle of classes

You also have small minor parties like
- Green Party: ECO party, also in USA
- UKIP: Want to leave EU
- BNP: Racist, Communist Party, Not right in the head

That's wrong on so many levels Democrats in their US form are probably slightly to the right of Conservatives and the Republicans would probably be considered an extremist party. Of course the Democrats would probably be allowed to be a bit more left wing over here and still have a chance to get elected. Lib Dems and Cons are in coalition at the moment and both are losing popularity quick. I'd expect Ukip and the Greens are going to get a lot more of the vote. The Greens will probably gain more seats as they concentrate on the grass roots a bit more.(Hence why they already have a seat in Parliment.

UKIP like most right party concentrate on dumb right wing populist policies, which if you delve deeper don't really work. 'Stop the promotion of multiculturalism', so what they want minorites to bunch together a live in virtual ghettos. UKIP are like the Libertarians, they make a good point but the people behind them make you feel uneasy.

Swark · 11-26-2012, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karma101

I bet I could find a video of a street in England where there were mostly white people on it as well.

Pretty much that.

And just because someones skin isn't white doesn't mean they weren't born and raised in Britain, and considers themselves British.

Mithro · 11-27-2012, 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by just1988

For anybody saying that UKIP's current political messages seem to be quite sensible, may I remind you that Adolf Hitler was once an art student, the German's encouraged him and over time turned him into the biggest mainstream villain the world has ever known.

That being said I don't think the UKIP party will necessarily go that far but I do believe that over time and the more power they get that the more controversial their views will become.

As far as this news story goes, people have to look passed their own political views and think what is best for the children. If these children aren't "indigenous to England" then what kind of heart ache are they in for as they grow up and realise mum and dad have a healthy dislike for their fellow foreign bretherin? Or even worse, these kids could be brainwashed over time and there's nothing worse than non-Caucasian people wanting to fit in with whites so much that they sell themselves out and people who look like them, so they can take crumbs from the white mans table [Malcolm X/]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Asenath

. . .I don't know. If I were the caseworker for children who are members of an ethnic minority, and the foster parents were part of some "Britain for White Folks" party, I might do a little extra scrutinizing there, too.

(And correct me if I'm wrong, but don't those in the know call the Telegraph the "Torygraph" - implying that it leans conservative on most things? This does seem to be a one sided article.)

Liberals like you guys are really fucking dangerous, first, both of you cheering someone going to jail for racist comments on the web, and now cheering the taking away of children just because of political views.

Anti-freedom liberals have considerably outnumbered anti-freedom conservatives now, but instead of hiding behind God and country, you hide behind what you consider hate speech, and hurt feelings.

**Karma101** · 11-27-2012, 04:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mithro

Liberals like you guys are really fucking dangerous, first, both of you cheering someone going to jail for racist comments on the web, and now cheering the taking away of children just because of political views.

Anti-freedom liberals have considerably outnumbered anti-freedom conservatives now, but instead of hiding behind God and country, you hide behind what you consider hate speech, and hurt feelings.

Pretty suspicious that they had three fostered foreign children though wasn't it? God knows what they were trying to do with them.