Wrestling Forum banner

£40m if you can turn my daughter straight

6K views 79 replies 38 participants last post by  Alim 
#1 ·

£40m for any man who can turn my gay daughter straight: Father's shock offer after lesbian wedding ceremony



As a billionaire playboy who claims to have bedded 10,000 women, Cecil Chao has no doubts about his own sexuality.
Now he is trying to dictate the sexuality of his children too.
The 76-year-old property and shipping tycoon is offering a £40million ‘marriage bounty’ to any man who can win the heart of his lesbian daughter – and turn her straight.

He announced the reward after his daughter, Gigi, married her same-sex partner in France.

Refusing to accept the gay union, he pledged the fortune to any potential male suitor able to walk the 33-year-old University of Manchester graduate down the aisle at a traditional wedding.

The famously promiscuous Hong Kong businessman dismissed ‘false reports’ of his daughter’s lesbian nuptials and insisted she was still single.
‘I don’t mind whether he is rich or poor – the important thing is that he is generous and kind hearted,’ he said of the ideal husband for his daughter.
‘Gigi is a very good woman with both talents and looks. She is devoted to her parents, is generous and does volunteer work,’ he told the South China Morning Post.
Same-sex marriages are not recognised in Hong Kong.
According to reports, the spat between Mr Chao and his daughter erupted last week when she announced at an event in Beijing that she tied the knot with her long-term lover, Sean Eav, five months ago. A regular on the city’s social circuit and in celebrity magazines, Mr Chao has never been married. Gigi is the oldest of his three children with three mothers.

In addition to the dowry, he has also offered to start his potential son-in-law up in his own business.

He said the prize money was ‘an inducement to attract someone who has the talent, but not the capital, to start his own business’.
According to the BBC, Miss Chao said she found her father’s plan ‘entertaining’ and wouldn’t give it too much thought until an actual suitor had been found.

I'd give it a shot.



It's the one on the right. And not the Yoko Ono lookalike (that's her wife).
 
#45 ·
lol. You have an interesting perspective on how the world works.
 
#50 ·
I can assume this in the same way that the gays ask us to assume that they have no choice. I can only speak for myself, which is pretty much the whole concept behind assumption. Everything about a person that is not physically or mentally inherited can be moulded into whatever they please.
 
#51 ·
Your dodging the questions and hiding behind your homophobia. It's very sad that you are incapable of having a very basic discussion about human sexuality yet be so sure that you are correct in what you say regarding said topic.
 
#54 ·
Prefacing every opinion with "Well, in my opinion..." would just serve to make my sentences look awkward. In a conversation like this, I don't think I should have to say that I am making remarks based on my opinions. Not once have I cited anything to back up my opinions as fact.
 
#59 ·
Unnatural sexual activities are a different issue. Basically every form of intercourse can be performed on somebody of the opposite sex. Everybody has urges, normal people go about these urges alone or with a consenting somebody of the opposite gender. Immoral people go about these urges via homosexual activities or rape.

No, there is no "right" sexuality, as right and wrong are matters of opinion. However, there are productive and non-productive sexualities, productive being the ones that help further the human race, non-productive being homosexuality.

Numbered genders beyond male, female and intersex are just theoretical nonsense designed to further the homosexual agenda.
 
#60 ·
Non-productive sexualities are homosexual? Again that subscribes to a sexual binary, that simply is not true else we would not have sexualities like bisexuality, pansexuality, and asexuality. Productive sexualities refers to heterosexual vaginal intercourse for the sole reason of continuation of species? That still does not explain oral intercourse, anal intercourse, or masturbation etc. How can you, using biological determinism, explain these things is the purpose of intercourse is the continuation of species?

You say there is no "right" sexuality but are so quick to demonize homosexuality... interesting.

I said crossing genders not creating new ones. If Native Americans practicing gender-crossing habits happened before the concept of homosexuality, which it did, how can it be about furthering the homosexual agenda? Furthermore, what is the homosexual agenda?
 
#61 ·
Gender crossing is essentially creating a new gender. If you're a woman that identifies as a male, you're still a biological woman, which is why I said that putting labels on anything other than the big three is just nonsense.

I addressed the issue of abnormal sex practices, saying that urges can be satisfied in natural or immoral ways.

I'm quick to "demonize" homosexuality because I believe that it is wrong, gross and detrimental to the continuation of the human race.

The homosexual agenda is the idea that homosexuality is something that should be accepted, and that homosexuals are on the same moral and functional level as heterosexuals.
 
#62 ·
How can you label what they are doing as homosexual if the concept "homosexual" did not exist at that time? Allegedly abnormal/unnatural sexual practices can be satisfied through normal/natural means? That's quite contradictory. If they can be satisfied by normal/natural means could it not be possible that they are not inherently unnatural/abnormal?

Homosexuality thus far has not been detrimental to the continuation of the human race as we continue to experience exponential growth in our species, something that is proven to be detrimental.

The homosexual agenda applies the concept of "homosexual", something that I have repeatedly stated as being relatively new. Why shouldn't homosexuality be accepted? Because of your own personal prejudices? Could I take the same stand on heterosexuality and expect people to buy into that ideal?
 
#63 ·
Heterosexuality is something that has been accepted since the beginning of time. Homosexuality is a much newer concept. I am not the only person in the world that doesn't like gays, there are plenty of people that won't stand for it, evidenced by homosexual marriage being illegal in the majority of the US. Heterosexuality is already accepted, so I doubt an anti-hetero movement would have very many supporters.

In speaking of abnormal sex practices, the practices themselves are abnormal, not the way in which you go about performing them. I guess a better word would have been alternative, as opposed to abnormal.
 
#64 ·
Since the beginning of time? That's too broad of a statement. When exactly did time begin?

I'm asking about cultures where homosexuality or, more accurately, homosexual behavior (because the concept of homosexuality is new) was accepted and practiced such as gender-crossing of the Native Americans or the same-sex relationships between men in ancient Greece. Those are just two examples that were practiced and socially accepted. Evidently heterosexuality has been accepted, but it obviously is not solely for the purpose of continuation of species. Why deny the possibilities of different sexualities when they exist? You say that there is no definitive right sexuality yet you condemn or dismiss anything other than heterosexuality.
 
#65 · (Edited)
I'm not sure how I can put this in simpler terms. There is no such thing as right or wrong when talking about opinions. There is no right or wrong sexuality in a factual sense. That sexualities other than heterosexuality are "wrong" is my opinion, not a fact.

Homosexuality is not accepted like heterosexuality is, pseudo-homosexual activities that were accepted centuries ago are not the same thing as modern homosexuality.

As far as the beginning of time, I was using that as a figure of speech. Heterosexuality has obviously been accepted for as long as humans have been around or else there would be no humans to speak of.
 
#66 ·
You posit your opinion as fact, which it isn't. You can't fully explain why homosexuality is wrong? It's gross? There are plenty of things that are gross that are not wrong considering gross is an incredibly subjective adjective. It doesn't contribute to the continuation of our species? Neither does the use of birth control or non-reproductive sexual activities. Immoral? Define immoral and moral. Who gets to decide what is moral and what is not?

You can't use pseudo-homosexual in describing those activities because homosexuality was not a concept.

Who are you to deny other people of their humanity and personhood? That is what you are doing. Bigotry is bigotry, which is wrong. It's been socially established that bigotry is wrong, at least in our society.
 
#67 ·
I'm not sure how I'm making my opinions out to be facts, considering I've posted several times now that I am responding to this thread with my opinions.

A male and a male or a female and a female in a relationship is homosexual, similar practices would be the same basic concept. I've never heard anybody refer to an older television as a "non-HD non-flatscreen dial television" just because there is superior technology out now. You can paint a pig blue, but it is still a pig.

I've never said that nobody should be gay. That is their choice, not mine. I've simply said that I think it's disgusting, immoral* and doesn't further the continuation of our species.

*my opinion
 
#68 ·
The entire second paragraph is wrong. You can't apply a concept like homosexuality to practices held in a time where homosexual did not exist as a distinct concept, it doesn't work.

You don't say they shouldn't, but you definitely imply it. You offer no explanations as to why it is wrong other than it does not further the continuation of our species, an argument which I have blown out of the water.
 
#69 ·
I don't see how you've blown that out of the water. If some sort of doomsday scenario/superbug outbreak were to occur and wipe out the majority of the population, the gays wouldn't be able to help repopulate. Then again, they could just choose to be straight, which I assume they would if survival is on the line.

If homosexuality and other same-sex relationships can't be equated, why did you bring them up in the first place?

I don't like gays, if it were up to me, homosexuality would not exist. However, it is not up to me, and therefore I believe that people should be what they want to be. That doesn't mean that I would want myself or my family to associate with them.
 
#71 ·
Again, when did you choose to be exclusively heterosexual? If sexuality is pure choice as you have posited as fact then you can pinpoint when you decided you were exclusively sexually attracted to the opposite sex. But are you attracted to them for the sole reason of continuation of species? If not, then your argument is flawed because that is what you find wrong in homosexuality in that it does not further the continuation of our species.

Gender-crossing in Native Americans is not about same-sex relationships. You say that you know a lot about sexuality but cannot make the distinction between gender-crossing and same-sex relationships? I bring them up because you preach it's all about choice and that they are wrong, but the reason you say they are wrong (homosexual) did not exist at that point in time. You do not believe that people should be the way they want to be as proven by your homophobia. You want people to be the way you are or what you accept as appropriate.
 
#72 ·
I've said numerous times that people can be what they want to be. There is a difference between being disgusted by a type of person and believing that they could realistically be eradicated.

I do find it wrong that homosexuals can't reproduce. That does not mean that the sole reason I believe in heterosexuality is the fact that they can reproduce. Heterosexuality is natural, accepted and the way that it has been for generations.

I'm not seeing where you're going with the gender crossing/homosexuality thing here. I'm saying that I don't agree with the gays and you bring up similar yet completely different practices to somehow discredit my opinion?

I do believe that sexuality is a choice. People choose to be attracted to whatever sex they're attracted to the same way that they choose to wake up every morning. It isn't like picking what suit to wear to a business meeting or deciding what brand of milk to buy, it's more of a subconscious decision, but a decision nonetheless.

Again, this is all my opinion, if I haven't made that abundantly clear by now.
 
#73 ·
If sexuality was a choice I'd choose to be bisexual right fucking now "I hear bisexuals get the most fun".Turns out I don't like men and only like women,I don't choose to be heterosexual I'm just born that way.

Unnatural? A shitload of animal species have their homosexual minorities.Homosexuality is almost in every kind of creature.Calling homosexuality unnatural is like calling sex itself unnatural.

Sorry man,But your opinion is all kinds of stupid and is probably based of a stupid cult that teaches you to look at homosexuality with disgust.
 
#75 ·
Overpopulation can have some serious consequences. Homosexuality is most likely essential. A means by mother nature to control population growth. If this is the case, then homosexuality is natural.

Everything exists for a reason.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top