Thread Tools

**That Guy** · 05-30-2012, 03:38 AM

Just want to point something out on the topic of "Bin Laden being dead for many years and old tapes of his have been played instead". As someone who knows what he is talking about, in the millitary, I can honestly tell you that Bin Laden died on the day that they said he died, however, the whereabouts of his hide-outs and where he was all the years was known, but there are reasons why they didn't do anything earlier.

dcl813 · 05-30-2012, 05:59 AM

I got a good one. Cat is a ugly bitch, not the foreign chick she keeps posting. Newsflash: quit stealing pics from photo bucket and passing them off as yourself, ya dumb cunt!!!

TomasThunder619 · 05-30-2012, 02:11 PM

Here's another consiracy:

Mind Control

It may be done in a few different ways.

Have you heard of "the 25th frame"? It is used in movies and TV. Human's eye can only process 24 frames per second. Our mind catches the 25th frame, but we don't process it and are not aware of it. For example, if words "Coca Cola" or "You're thirsty" are shown im the 25 frame, then without realiseing it, we will feel the effect.

Also, when words are recorded backwards in the songs.

Camoron · 05-30-2012, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomasThunder619

Here's another consiracy:

Mind Control

It may be done in a few different ways.

Have you heard of "the 25th frame"? It is used in movies and TV. Human's eye can only process 24 frames per second. Our mind catches the 25th frame, but we don't process it and are not aware of it. For example, if words "Coca Cola" or "You're thirsty" are shown im the 25 frame, then without realiseing it, we will feel the effect.

Also, when words are recorded backwards in the songs.

You're confusing the amount of frames per second required to be perceived as fluid motion with the processing capability of the human eye. They are not the same thing. There is no "FPS limit" of human eyes because human eyes do not see in frames but by processing continuous light information, and the idea that anything beyond 24 FPS could involve subliminal messages is nonsense. Theoretically you could insert subliminal messages as a 25th frame and it's possible some people may not notice it just because of how quick it is, but if you were to pause and examine frame by frame the image would still be there and there is nothing special about it being the "25th frame" that would make it difficult to notice, it could just as easily be the 8th frame or the 19th frame or whatever. The upcoming Hobbit film for example is going to be screened in 48 frames per second, the Avatar sequels perhaps even in 60, and videogames certainly aren't bound by any "24 fps" restrictions. Television under the PAL standard is 25 fps; NTSC at about 30.

**Panther** · 05-30-2012, 09:29 PM

Hell I'll say it. I'm PRO NWO. I'm for a unified world. A stronger UN with a united government BUT each territory has sovereign rights. Kind of like states within the US but to a greater extent. I've seen the divisiveness caused by aggressive nation states and the ethnic chaos caused by empires.

If we come across alien civilizations one day in the future, especially aggressive ones, it'll only be a matter of time before we HAVE to unite or face extinction of the entire human race.

**JOAL.com** · 05-30-2012, 09:31 PM

am i the only person who finds it hard to believe any conspiracy where lady gaga is a focal point?

also, the concept of subliminal advertising was proven to be false. it doesnt exist. the brain doesnt process information like that. but what if the report that subliminal advertising isnt real is part of a government conspiracy blah blah blah gay shit blah blah

Camoron · 05-30-2012, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panther

Hell I'll say it. I'm PRO NWO. I'm for a unified world. A stronger UN with a united government BUT each territory has sovereign rights. Kind of like states within the US but to a greater extent. I've seen the divisiveness caused by aggressive nation states and the ethnic chaos caused by empires.

If we come across alien civilizations one day in the future, especially aggressive ones, it'll only be a matter of time before we HAVE to unite or face extinction of the entire human race.

If we come across intelligent alien civilizations in the future it's more likely they'll be way behind us in technology than ahead of us. See: Avatar, but without the bullshit dragon things that let them defeat technology thousands of years more advanced than theirs. If they're ahead of us they'll probably be so far ahead of us that we either wouldn't stand a chance of mounting any resistance or wouldn't even register on their radar. The likelihood of even finding other intelligent life out in our massive universe is low enough, but when you add in the stipulation that their technology be near the same level as ours that likelihood decreases exponentially following the Drake equation.

JoseDRiveraTCR7 · 05-30-2012, 10:33 PM

I believe Owen Hart is still alive.

chada75 · 05-31-2012, 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panther

Hell I'll say it. I'm PRO NWO. I'm for a unified world. A stronger UN with a united government BUT each territory has sovereign rights. Kind of like states within the US but to a greater extent. I've seen the divisiveness caused by aggressive nation states and the ethnic chaos caused by empires.

If we come across alien civilizations one day in the future, especially aggressive ones, it'll only be a matter of time before we HAVE to unite or face extinction of the entire human race.

I'm all for your idea. Seriously.

HardKoR · 05-31-2012, 01:10 PM