Quote:
Originally Posted by King_Kool-Aid™
TNA has Angle and Sting for christ sakes. They're just doing it all wrong.
|
If they had 1997 Sting and 2001 Angle then i'd agree. Although having said that, Angle is having a great year.
What they do have is Sting and Nash who are both well past the prime and have been for about 10 years in and around the main event. Not to mention Booker T who's just flat out terrible and Samoa Joe who can't draw and is about as interesting as watching paint dry. With Cage possibly leaving as well things aren't exactly looking rosey.
The only similarity between TNA and WCW is that WCW had these main eventers in their prime (Sting, Booker, Nash, hell... Jarrett as well I suppose) and TNA are still using them a decade later.
As for the threads' question... extremely difficult to judge. Probably not, because obviously the nWo angle would have most likely not coming around and that really was WCW's ratings machine.