View Single Post

Old 05-17-2008, 04:44 AM   #3 (permalink)
enchantressphoenix
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
 
enchantressphoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 77
enchantressphoenix 101 - 250enchantressphoenix 101 - 250
Default Re: Has-Beens and TNA.

I wouldn't agree with having all of those stars, but some of them can actually pull off a good match when it comes to it. Of course, every single match a wrestler has will not have you on the edge of your seat. Sting had a great match awhile back at a pay per view and had the whole crowd chanting, "you still got it" and he is the oldest one on your list. Scott Steiner had a pretty good match at the pay per view with Kaz and Joe. I believe TNA takes in a lot of these wrestlers cause really, where else is there for them to go? Most won't go to WWE, and most come from WWE because of unfair treatment. TNA realizes that fans know of a lot of their stars' unfair treatment, so they tune in to TNA in hopes of them being done better. TNA does make a lot of bad decisions with superstars like Angle, who at times makes TNA look like TNAngle, but I still think they're far above WCW. Bringing in Ultimate Warrior could definitely be taking strides toward WCW though, I agree. He's been out of wrestling long enough to just stay out.
enchantressphoenix is offline   Reply With Quote