HLOTN

Whether Taker wins the title back or not, it was an interesting angle either way. It wasn't pointless to strip him of the title, only to have him win it back anyway. It's called storyline progression. Undertaker vs Edge was a little dry, but it's more interesting now.

As for all the Triple H comments, it continues to baffle me. He used politics to end Orton's reign? Now I'm not what you would call a HHH fan but he didn't win at Mania did he? Thats a sign - whether Trips wanted it or not - that Vince does give others an opportunity. Triple H is a fresh choice as champion. He's probably the second marketable guy on the Raw roster behind Cena, so it only makes sense to give him a run with the belt. It's not as if he's the same mundane character he was in 2003 when he was on top of Raw undeservedly. And he's put over a ton of guys since 2004. All of the HHH bashers did indeed have an argument in 2003, but it's too outdated and it's time to move on. I doubt he's squeaky clean, but then I don't think a lot of the top guys are.

And Taker does have his fair share of power. I thought everybody knew that. I'm sure if Taker was married to Stephanie, he'd get the level of bashing. In fact, anyone would because it's the sure fire easy target.