Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jimthor The Oblong
Simply enough, with three televised shows a week (four if you include a PPV), plus a bunch of house shows, the wrestlers would be far overworked if there was no brand split.
For example, lets take the WWE Champ John Cena. He's the flagship of the WWE, as he holds the title with the "big name". Imagine if his shedule for the week suddenly was tripled. If all shows weren't branded, you'd want the champ on them all. And that would be no good for him.
(this is just an example, its the same for many wrestlers that would be over-worked).
As well as this, we might not get a chance for a lot of talent to develop in the midcard, as the midcard will be full of excess main eventers. A lot of guys that get TV time now probably wouldn't.
|
i prefer the brand split but i guess it would be good to have an overall roster between brands but exclusive titles to each of them which all wrestlers can challenge for. example raw has wwe title, ic title and womens title, sd has us title, cw title and tag titles, ecw has hardcore title. Whereby if Cena was champ he would only be on raw and anyone who gets into a program with cena would only be on raw til the program endz.