samoajoebucfan

Loved the 2/3 falls. It was a very different match type. I wish they would do more things like that to cap off feuds. I liked the event overall and this was the icing on the cake. As far as the event goes, it was very good and shows how good smaller PPV's can be when they have both rosters involved. I loved Kurt winning the belt but he was the face, and they made him look very very weak. That pissed me off when watching the DVD a couple weeks ago. Brock Lesnar basically won the match for you, and when you're a face, that hurts your credibility. He did turn heel a couple weeks later though.

I have not seen Survivor Series 2003. I have it on my Netflix list but won't receive it for a while.

I have seen Survivor Series 96-2002 though. I don't remember details about alot of them but I can tell you what I do remember if you want.

And to the McMahon DVD. It was ok. It was NOT as good as many people say it is. I find it to be very kayfabe and they skipped over alot of things that would make Vince look bad. I mean the real Vince, not the character Vince. I disliked the kayfabe nature of the DVD, but it was ok. It bugged me that they completely skipped like 15 years of time. They went from him taking over territories and stealing Hulk Hogan in the early 80's, to his feud with WCW in 95. No steroid trial, no Hulkamania, nothing. Really a let down there.

Anyway, I have just watched Royal Rumble 03, and will review it if you guys like. I have No Way Out 2003 coming later in the week (no spoilers please) and I will review that also if asked.