Re: It's sad that WWE has to rely on superstars from the past
Originally Posted by nevereveragainu
well if it were just Bryan vs Dolph it wouldn't be worth 40 dollars, for a much lesser price then OH WAIT wwe ppvs tend to have many more matches and a show you pay for tend to OH I DON'T KNOW HAVE OTHER MATCHES THAN THE MAIN EVENT WORTH A LOOK SEE
but then again with the lack of demand in wrestling nowadays espcially compared to football or ufc then maybe wrestling should be on ppv anymore
d'you ever think of that?
The thing is, WWE is doing GREAT by all standerds, yes its down for it self, but it self was an unstopable monoply, it still easily beats super bowl and other shows many times easily with out breaking a sweat.
Is it bad for it self? yes, for ppv in genreal? its doing great