Originally Posted by xdoomsayerx
Ridiculous. I've heard it all
"Bryan could be face of the company"
"Bryan should face Brock"
"Bryan should be wwe champion"
"bryan is better than Shawn Michaels"
"Bryan is better than Kurt angle"
First off, if this thread gets deleted it'll prove that it doesn't wanna hear anything negative about Bryan and that it's full of Bryan marks... I'm making points here.
I don't hate Bryan. He's probably the best in ring wrestler wwe has, and i think hes a top midcarder/ emergency main eventer. Maybe win another world title..... BUT I can't take him serious as a face of the company/facing Brock lesnar. Bryan still has no mic skills to be a main guy in wwe. He's also getting fat which isn't good he needs to get back in shape. How many 5 star matches has he had?? Only 2 IMO. Extreme rules with sheamus and MITB with punk.
How people are saying he's better than angle and Michaels is absolutely laughable.
Now, you can like Bryan and all, but how can you not sayhe's overrated in the IWC?? Again I DON'T HATE BRYAN.
Agreed. It's one thing to say he's talented, entertaining, and one of the best performers in the company, but it's another thing entirely to say all of the ridiculous claims above. Yet, many of the Bryan marks here say these things, and it really doesn't make them seem too smart. But hey, a marks gonna mark.
I'm neutral on Daniel Bryan. There's no doubt he's a talented technician, but is he really this super ultra, total package performer that his marks claim he is? I have yet to see this. It's just the way his fans put him on such a pedestal as if he was the GOAT is just laughable, annoying, and delusional.