Originally Posted by Regnes
Backlund should headline the thing, he was overall much more important to the industry than Mick Foley ever was. I know people are saying Foley is more famous these days because he's only about a decade or so separated from his career, but isn't the whole purpose of the Hall of Fame to preserve the memory of past legends? What's the point if you're just going to play it off like the newer stuff is always better?
It would be like if Cena and Lou Thesz were inducted the same year, you would be retarded to put Cena over Thesz.
Backlund is a bigger star than Foley.
Foley is more relevant to the current generation so WWE would probably put Foley to headline the HOF.