Originally Posted by Bananas
Liverpool paid 5M upfront to Madrid to loan the player. They may have been reimbursed something since letting him go, but nevertheless they've still burned a big whole in their pockets for nothing. And to think that everyone was criticising Arsenal for not getting him at the start of the season. Racist English media and all that.
I don't get your point. Sahin isn't a bad player, he was bad because he was misused by Liverpool and he was injured for a period too wasn't he. So it would be a fair criticism because Arsenal could've signed him, used him properly and he may have been a success. Just guess-work but Sahin himself is a quality player.