Sure. But what the hell is the point? If the supershow ended and Smackdown was Smackdown, and RAW was WAR again, then it'd be great to see. Otherwise, I don't really care.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stocking Filled w/HAYLEY JOY~!
There is no more brand splits. How could someone "stay" on RAW when they work on Smackdown too? Only people that don't are Punk & Cena (full time). Rest is fair game.
Why am I the only person who seems to have noticed this? Feel like I'm in an episode of the Twilight Zone.
|
No, I noticed it too, and I noticed that people aren't noticing it too. Some think the titles have stayed brand loyal, but they've not even kept that. Nothing is sacred any more.
Quote:
In response to the question the thread posed: no.
Perhaps in a year after they abandon this bullshit YES/NO nonsense, give him a decent character and let the guy work instead of saddling him with comedy (that includes giving him back his moveset, not the 3-4 moves he repeats ad nauseum). But as long as he keeps up with YES/NO, I don't want to see him on my TV screen period, let alone being pushed as a top guy.
|
You'd call his comedy a burden? It's what's kept him one of the most entertaining people on the roster. Would you likewise say that Kurt Angle's comedy was a burden?