Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums - View Single Post - NFL Thread: RAVENS SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS

View Single Post

Old 12-03-2012, 08:10 AM   #4543 (permalink)
Priceless Blaze
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
Priceless Blaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Macon,Ga
Posts: 1,325
Priceless Blaze 1501 - 2000Priceless Blaze 1501 - 2000Priceless Blaze 1501 - 2000Priceless Blaze 1501 - 2000Priceless Blaze 1501 - 2000Priceless Blaze 1501 - 2000Priceless Blaze 1501 - 2000Priceless Blaze 1501 - 2000Priceless Blaze 1501 - 2000Priceless Blaze 1501 - 2000Priceless Blaze 1501 - 2000
Default Re: NFL Thread: Week 13 - STEELERS FANS ASSEMBLE

I'd like too see if it gets answered and opinions on it and what not, when people talk about who the good teams are, people try to use the whole who has rings and who doesn't theory, how many years do you feel a team can live off my team has a ring, yours doesn't theory for it to be a logical and good reason too say said team is better? Like okay the Jets have 1 Superbowl Ring, where the Falcons do not, but the Jet's Superbowl was in 1968 back when it was still an NFL/AFL championship game, would that make them better then the Falcons? or any other team that doesn't have a Superbowl ring because people who don't play anymore won a Superbowl for the team?

For me, it depends on how many you got before you can set a year, 1 ring I say after about 7 or 8 years, that ring vs no ring shouldn't apply, then I guess after awhile you just keep adding a year from there if you like for each ring said team has. I ask this because I see some 1-2 ring teams fans use the ring theory after not having a Superbowl win in a few years and it's like, the ones who won that ring have nothing to do at all with the game anymore, and if they do it's like maybe 1 or 2 at the most still on the team and that doesn't really make them better.
__________________
Priceless Blaze is offline