Re: Would one World Title really be better for WWE?
It all comes down to gate revenue. From a company standpoint, they probably want to end all house shows with some kind of World Title on the line since they know their cards would appear even more lackluster without one. This is due to them not having big enough household names that could carry a card without being seen as Champion like they have in the past.
That was one thing about the Attitude Era I liked the most. The Title structure. It had something for everybody. It's just hard to get 2 World Titles over when they are being showcased on both shows. It's hard enough to get both Mid-card Titles over these days. Either separate the two Brands entirely or unify and pick up the pieces of a damaged era that should have ended years ago.