Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jul 2012
Analyze This: Greatest of All Times
Before the start, please do not bring in names and make this a debate why a wrestler A or B is great or not. This is about the bigger picture where I want to open a discussion on what is the generally accepted and your individual criteria for calling someone Greatest of All Times in pro-wrestling in your opinion and since when did business and drawing became a criteria for Greatness overshadowing in ring talent and entertainment factor?
To me, Greatness criteria include the following:
- In Ring Ability
- Promo Skills
- Ring Psychology/Storytelling
- Gimmick/Character performance
- Longevity (A one year run as a great entertainer is not enough for me to call someone G.O.A.T)
P.S: Please do not make this a A vs B discussion and keep it generic.