Wrestling Forum Related
Wrestling Forum Rules
Suggestions & Help
Wrestling Forum News
World Wrestling Entertainment
Other Pro Wrestling Forum
Total Nonstop Action Wrestling!
Be The Booker
Wrestling Women, Celebs & Models
Women of Wrestling
Games & Trivia
Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Indy Wrestling, Lucha Underground, Women of Wrestling Forums
Would one World Title really be better for WWE?
View Single Post
11-16-2012, 10:51 PM
Regularly Beating Up James Ellsworth
Join Date: Nov 2008
Re: Would one World Title really be better for WWE?
They won't go back because they like running two sets of house shows (for obvious reasons) still, if one were to just set that aside there'd be no reason not to combine the titles. The WHC is, on its best day, a midcard title already. The brand split, although never treated very seriously, is now completely disregarded. Get rid of the WHC, and let the IC title set up into its spot. It really wouldn't be that difficult a transition since WWE treats the WHC as a secondary title anyway.
I know people will dislike this because it will result in many wrestlers not holding a world title who otherwise would if there were two. To that I say: Too bad. Part of the problem with the world title scene is it seems like anyone can hold the title. Any midcarder can step up, win the belt in some bullshit fashion, have a shitty reign, and then go back to Superstars. That's not a good thing. If getting rid of that sort of thing means that some wrestlers might be denied a world title reign, then so be it.
SarcasmoBlaster is offline
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by SarcasmoBlaster
-- Wrestling Forum (Full - Red)
---- Wrestling Forum (Dark - Red)
-- Wrestling Forum (Full - Blue)
---- Wrestling Forum (Dark - Blue)
-- Wrestling Forum (Classic I)
-- Wrestling Forum (Classic II)
-- Wrestling Forum (Mobile)
v1.4 Copyright ©2007,
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to