Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Dec 2011
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Re: would one world title really be better for wwe?
So it would have taken him 15-20 years to get the title? And how many talented guys has there been that have been in the WWE for years, and never won the title.
yeah i guess ur right about this, this was largely the case in the 80's and 1990's, with many legends not holding the world title mr perfect etc. i could see many guys not being champion had it be only 1 title guys like the miz,big show, mark henry,christian etc. But i really think that winning the world heavyweight title these days has lost its prestige and doesnt mean as much because of they way they just pass it around to guys like swagger and del rio etc, i remember when benoit won the world title in 2004 it felt so big to the fans