Originally Posted by NearFall
Two bad segments and you call Ryback a failure. But when somebody ESTABLISHED like Punk gets 2 bad segements you call it "an off day" or "the storyline sucks". You should not double standard like that. And for the record, RyBack was not the full quater holder in either of those quaters. Filler stuff occupied it too(like Be-A-Star and a Sheamus doll).
What about these:
An Undead Funeral Director
A man who refers to himself in third person and used catchphrases all the time
A redneck who guzzled beer and hated his boss
A champion who doesn't weigh more than 210 pounds and is referred to ON-SCREEN as "skinnyfat"
A man who wears a rainbow of colours and acts like a boyscout
Its wrestling, when you're over with the crowd, you're over and popular.
Damn it seems like I'm fighting off the world here loll
CM Punk is never celebrated as being a big draw unlike for reason Ryback is (and I'm not saying CM Punk is a big draw, he isn't). I'm just stressing to some people that Ryback isn't either.
And the people listed above were actual characters, please someone explain to me what the fuck Ryback is supposed to be?
And everyone should stop getting hung up on my believability criticism and focus and the bigger problem, that he's been wrestling in developmental for 8 years and WWE don't trust him to wrestle 10 mins on a main event of a PPV and 3 mins on TV. I dare anyone to defend him when it comes to this aspect.