Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Indy Wrestling, Lucha Underground, Women of Wrestling Forums - View Single Post - Vince and the Officials treatment of Bryan

View Single Post
post #48 of (permalink) Old 11-06-2012, 12:28 AM
Making James Ellsworth GET MY BAGS
vanboxmeer's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,253
Points: 0
Re: Vince and the Officials treatment of Bryan

Originally Posted by Stall_19 View Post
Not updated in a couple of weeks but
CM Punk = 18-21-3

That's his record this year so far. Wins and loses don't matter.
Already back to complete dunceville one liners. Guess you know more about pro wrestling than Shawn Michaels. Guess you think if Ryback was trading wins with Jindar Mahal and Drew McIntyre during his ascent he'd be just as over as he is now. John Cena certainly got no booking help being booked to be a winner. Not like casual fans don't like winners as they have for the past 100 years of pro wrestling. I mean The Undertaker's streak certainly means nothing, because wins don't mean anything and his 0 losses has no appeal to his draw.

I do have one question for anyone who might feel that Dwayne Johnson "owes" the business. Is it just him, or is it anyone who moved on to other things? Should Luna Vachon get heat for running a towing company instead of working on RAW? Should Maven be critiqued on his Home Shopping Network bits instead of wrestling?

Or is it only the ones who go on to highly visible careers in movies that owe something? Why do Johnson (who left after putting people over, doing the traditionally "right thing") and Lesnar (who did not; except for making Eddie a legitimate star) get called sell-outs who "forgot where they came from" when someone who retires to do some regular job get credit (as they should) for moving on and making it without falling into a sea of addiction?
vanboxmeer is offline  
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome