Originally Posted by SinJackal
Yet, Raw has had three hour shows several times in the past and never done that poorly. Raw's three hour show theme has been around now for months, and it's been bombing since Cena went out and Punk was the sole main event. That happened quickly too, so I don't think it's a coincidence. If you bing "wwe ratings", one of the top searches is, "WWE RAW ratings plummet with CM Punk as the main star", and that's back in May after Lesnar left and Cena was supposed to be "hurt".
It's not the same thing and you know it you're just trying hard to put over this Punk is causing the ratings to go down foolishness. Big difference between a 3 hour Raw every now and again to 3 hours every single week. Maybe you would have somewhat of a point if Punk's segments and matches were losing big numbers or numbers at all for that matter (which that whole segment by segment loss or gain thing is so flawed to me since not everyone changes the channel for the same reason) but that isn't the case as it's been the opposite actually. No one man is responsible for holding your interest in whatever else is going on during the show that he isn't involved in. Which is why this trying to blame one or give praise to one guy for the entire show is retarded but it gets done 9/10 times to either be used to diss a wrestler they don't like or stroke the ego of their a wrestler they do like. That's the only reason most people on here care about ratings to push your own little agendas whether it be praise or hate or as to why WWE sucks to them.