Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Originally Posted by bigdog40
It doesn't affect us so what does it matter. They could have the Rock, Stone Cold, Undertaker, Hulk Hogan, Rowdy Piper, Shawn Michaels, and they would draw a 3.2 at most in these day and age.
Oh the naive fools in here. Vince and USA network blowing a gasket undoubtedly will affect the product which in the end affects what the viewer is watching. Trotting out the defeatist attitude of "everything is out of our control, no matter what hypothetical thing we do" is already one foot in the grave.
I do have one question for anyone who might feel that Dwayne Johnson "owes" the business. Is it just him, or is it anyone who moved on to other things? Should Luna Vachon get heat for running a towing company instead of working on RAW? Should Maven be critiqued on his Home Shopping Network bits instead of wrestling?
Or is it only the ones who go on to highly visible careers in movies that owe something? Why do Johnson (who left after putting people over, doing the traditionally "right thing") and Lesnar (who did not; except for making Eddie a legitimate star) get called sell-outs who "forgot where they came from" when someone who retires to do some regular job get credit (as they should) for moving on and making it without falling into a sea of addiction?