Quote:
Originally Posted by Simba
That's not bad at all it wasn't that big a venue anyway so 60% capacity isn't bad. Considering the fact that most of the matches on the card had very little build 2900-3000 in attendance isn't bad at all.
|
for an indy crowd but this is no 2 in the world we are talking about
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeisgonnakillyou
True.
We can talk about how the crowd "looks" all day long, in the end of the day we are talking out of our asses because the real numbers aren't available. Overall, it's irrelevant because the crowd was hot during the entire show and that's what matters.
|
not available?
Quote:
Originally Posted by straightedge891
Lol Dirt Sheet.
|
one can simply walk into the doors of the venue and litterally hand count how many are there!
Quote:
Originally Posted by King_Of_This_World
Exactly, but the TNA fanboys simply cant grasp this.
Why would a 3000ish crowd in a 5000 arena 'look wrong' based on what we saw? It looks spot on.
|
can't grasp what
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeisgonnakillyou
Slammiversary was TNA's 10 years anniversary show... so yeah, that was the biggest show of year.
|
then why is bfg marketed as tnas biggest?