Originally Posted by Jaysfromnyc
The defenses for TNA are all fine and dandy, but here's the problem. The TNA HOF was created in response to WWE and Bound For Glory is set up to be TNA's WrestleMania. So ofcourse that is going to lead to making comparisons. You compare the two settings and yeah at does show how low rent TNA looks compared to WWE. Quiet honestly TNA shouldn't even have that one big event at this point. They should make all their shows matter. What really makes BFG stand out compared to other PPV shows and why? You say it is their Mania and it doesn't look good if you compare whatever they have to WWE in their big stadiums with 60,000 people.
Wrestlemania was created in response to Starrcade. What's your point?
Someone mentioned it earlier - TNA are always in a loose-loose situation. Damned if they do, damned if they don't.