Originally Posted by Jaysfromnyc
The defenses for TNA are all fine and dandy, but here's the problem. The TNA HOF was created in response to WWE and Bound For Glory is set up to be TNA's WrestleMania. So ofcourse that is going to lead to making comparisons. You compare the two settings and yeah at does show how low rent TNA looks compared to WWE. Quiet honestly TNA shouldn't even have that one big event at this point. They should make all their shows matter. What really makes BFG stand out compared to other PPV shows and why? You say it is their Mania and it doesn't look good if you compare whatever they have to WWE in their big stadiums with 60,000 people.
That's the thing though, it's THEIR Mania. Of course it's going to be downgraded, they don't have the fanbase that the superpower WWE has. I personally believe that for a company 10 years in the making they're doing just fine - especially in this current climate for wrestling. There's honestly no need to compare a 10 year-old company and a 60 year-old one. Just take what you're given and enjoy the show.