Re: Details on Vince's backstage blow-up
So for some of you, the justification is that it couldn't be Punk because he's in a good position at the moment, and instead it must be one of the company's golden boys (Cena, Orton, Sheamus or ADR) because they have more reason to be annoyed? Fucking LOL. Cena is Cena, Sheamus is on the push of his life, Orton is a problem child who's been handed World championships all career, and ADR has a laundry list of accomplishments in his short tenure.
ANY OF THEM, BUT IT COULDN'T BE PUNK! It couldn't be the guy that's known for speaking out. The guy that's shown a public interest in improving the product. No, it couldn't be that guy. Fuck him, all he cares about is the belt and that's proven by the fact that he's not single-handedly changed the entire direction of the company in the past 12 months.
Truth is, it could be any one of them, because the PRODUCT sucks. If this report is to be believed, it's about the direction of the company, not one individual push. I doubt it'll change anything in the long run (until Vince retires), but good on them for giving it the old college try.