Originally Posted by Magic
doc you're majoring in math or some bullshit, right? maybe phitz is. idk, but answer this question.
3. You operate a bakery. You buy cakes from a supplier who charges you $6 per cake.
Government regulations dictate that you can only charge a price between $12 and $24
per cake. Your research shows that if you were to charge $x per cake, you would sell
cakes per week.
(a) How much will you charge per cake?
(b) How much would you charge if there were no government regulations?
Is this all the information given? The question doesn't seem to make sense. Particularly the bolded bit. Is that 'x' a mutliplication sign or the variable?
Originally Posted by Shepard
ziggler mark seems like haystacks 2.0. i hope not since the two together could be a headache, although pumbaa has adapted and is easier to deal w/ these days
skyfall seems to have a better knowledge of mafia since i last played with him. nothing indicative of alignment so far, however. MAGIC why is it fake and too cautious
i dont see an issue with Pezleys entrance. feels natural.
why is voting rush productive but voting me the opposite
IMP is actually the overriding town read of the game. this is a 2011 game from him and im taking the credit with my vote
does cloverleaf ever do anything yet? from my experience all he does is add offhand remarks which are never really relevant or useful. and this was when i last played in like august
Faraday on your vote for imp you say you dont think he's made any particularly useful observations, why? I'd actually say leading up to that he's been fairly on topic and more useful than most.
doc do you plan to stick w/ the rush thing or not? i find it odd that you're trying to push it at a time of day when the aussies aren't active and if we all followed your vote we'd likely end up waiting around
post #121 from tkok is weird. saying whether or not he'll rage vote despite already putting a vote on X. which is itself is different from usual tkok in that he's doing something. almost like haystacks scum when he was more useful as non town
i like mikeys opening post, seems to not care how its viewed?
i never stated to be better. ive been living on reputation since the start of the year, im decidedly hit and miss in terms of actually being good, my strengths tend to be in bringing more out of others and generally adding to activity of games. this just gets mistaken by others as if i know what im doing
I didn't/don't expect anyone to follow my Rush vote. I've stated as such and given my reasons numerous times for voting him. I think i've also stated the following like three times already but I have no need to vote you for a reaction. I can get reads out of the posts you're making now. You're active enough as it is. Voting you wouldn't have made much of an impact on the game. That makes me sound like an attention seeker or something but hopefully you get what I mean