Originally Posted by Cookie Monster
Yeah because Goldberg throwing around jobbers and Brock Lesnar debuting ripping apart the likes of Spike Dudley and Al Snow before feuding in a 2 on 1 feud with the Hardys is so much more impressive in a destructive way.
Goldberg had years in American Football, he HAD to be an exceptional athlete. Lesnar was an amatuer wrestler as well as a fucking freak of nature. The sooner you separate Ryback from both of the men, the more you can probably enjoy him a little bit more.
You are missing the point. Goldberg and Lesnar did super impressive stuff. like triple powerbombing Jeff Hardy, Belly-to-Belly suplexing bigs how, Launching Triple H Sky-High, being incredibly agile for their size, the list goes on.
And why should i keep him to another standard? the fact is that he is a powerhouse who seems unbeatable and has a streak. shouldn't he be compared to other powerhouses who had a streak? Look at what Lesnar did in his first month in the WWE, look at his style, the things he pulled off. THAT is a believable powerhouse: being strong. Ryback simply doesn't seem as strong as the others, he's just big, and he doesn't know how to use that size worth dick.