Re: Fourteen year old strangles new born
well then, she had ~7 months to act which makes it hard to argue that it was done in the "spur of the moment" as you said.
I already explained my theory involving that part though.
I know that she killed a baby. that's a FACT. what you're doing is making assumptions because you don't seem to want to accept that some people can be this deranged.
and what does being raped have to do with this, if she was in fact raped? Why not just have an abortion. Murdering the baby in the way she did is just a horrifying crime that shouldn't just be overlooked if she was raped.
Whatever, just trying to understand the situation there's not much more I can say to you.