Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums - View Single Post - **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

View Single Post

Old 10-03-2012, 08:04 PM   #6706 (permalink)
#BadNewsSanta
Ho!
 
#BadNewsSanta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 13,902
#BadNewsSanta 8501 - 9000#BadNewsSanta 8501 - 9000#BadNewsSanta 8501 - 9000#BadNewsSanta 8501 - 9000#BadNewsSanta 8501 - 9000#BadNewsSanta 8501 - 9000#BadNewsSanta 8501 - 9000#BadNewsSanta 8501 - 9000#BadNewsSanta 8501 - 9000#BadNewsSanta 8501 - 9000#BadNewsSanta 8501 - 9000
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falkono View Post
You may want to look at the numbers again. Sheamus segment was 2.77 and the final quarter with Punk was a 2.70.
When they say gain/loss they mean from the previous quarter. If a quarter has a high loss then a high gain looks great. But it isn't if you compare to the highest parts of the show. The highest point was a 2.9. Seeing as it started with a 2.7 its shows the peak of the show ascent much at all. An additional 200k.
Wait wait, how do you figure out Sheamus' segment got a 2.77? From what I got, both Sheamus segments were lower than all of Punk's segments. Am I missing something on the breakdown?

Quote:
Maybe or maybe not. He cant do worse than punk in the ratings, thats for sure.
Actually he can do a lot worse. There's a lot of numbers below the 3,500,000 or so Raw got.

Quote:
Yes it is Steve Austin's fault if the overall viewership/rating drops because people tuned in to see him particularly. He is the main guy that the show revolves around.


Okay, now I see there is no longer a point in arguing with you. I'm not going to get anywhere doing so if that's the type of "logic" you go by.
__________________
I've got some bad news...


Last edited by #BadNewsSanta : 10-03-2012 at 08:07 PM.
#BadNewsSanta is offline