Originally Posted by Cack_Thu
You're in denial mode.Refer to my last post on the breakdown of WWE revenue ,what TV ratings mean to WWE and then get back to me.Myself not interested in shadow boxing.Facts speak for themselves.
I've seen it and you don't say that ratings related income is 100%. The word everything is synonymous with 100%. I already said that ratings mean something to the company in my first post, so just pointing that out was redundant. Especially since the actual point had nothing to do with whether the ratings mattered to WWE, but to a given viewer (which is what you should be responding to).
But even if I do go on the side track of what's important to WWE, obviously they still see enough worth in Punk to have him go on a historical top 10 reign in terms of length.