Re: £40m if you can turn my daughter straight
I'm not sure how I'm making my opinions out to be facts, considering I've posted several times now that I am responding to this thread with my opinions.
A male and a male or a female and a female in a relationship is homosexual, similar practices would be the same basic concept. I've never heard anybody refer to an older television as a "non-HD non-flatscreen dial television" just because there is superior technology out now. You can paint a pig blue, but it is still a pig.
I've never said that nobody should be gay. That is their choice, not mine. I've simply said that I think it's disgusting, immoral* and doesn't further the continuation of our species.
The entire second paragraph is wrong. You can't apply a concept like homosexuality to practices held in a time where homosexual did not exist as a distinct concept, it doesn't work.
You don't say
they shouldn't, but you definitely imply it. You offer no explanations as to why it is wrong other than it does not further the continuation of our species, an argument which I have blown out of the water.
"Everything anybody ever valued or struggled for... it's all a monstrous, demented gag! So why can't you see the funny side? Why aren't you laughing?"