Originally Posted by Tnmore
I dont understand why the theory "Low rating = Less entertaining product" is simply dismissed as false? I mean dont we attribute the Ratings/PPV buys success of the Attitude era to more entertaining product? more entertaining and larger than life characters?
So we can credit the success of a show in terms of ratings to the quality of the product, but not when it bombs?
The theory is flawed because not everybody likes the same shit. I personally really liked Raw this past Monday but someone else probably hated it. Cena could be champ and feuding with Big Show and Raw gets a 4.0 rating for example does that mean it's going to = entertaining to me? No, everybody watches for their own reasons and like and dislike different things. Everybody would be Cena fans if we used the if it's successful it must be good logic.