Getting over in the mid-card
Join Date: Sep 2004
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Re: The Montreal Screwjob.. Who acted worse?
Are you saying creative control makes for a worse product.? You yourself just said there isn't anyone in the company today with that kind of control.
Coincidence that the product is fucking terrible and that there is no creative control by the workers? I think not
Sent from my HTC Evo
Take a look at WCW 1998 and on and you see what I mean. Some wrestler's may control the assets of their character, but by total creative control is controlling everything about your character, even controlling if you win or lose. Let's say if Cena hate creative control of his character and he agrees to job to CM Punk, or Santino Marella. Then when match time comes, Cena changes his mind and says that he's going on. That's what I mean by creative control. Back in the attitude era, wrestlers could control their assets, but giving any wrestler complete control is asking for trouble, especially with all the egos involved in wrestling.
People complain about newer talent not getting over, but what they mean is that their favourite isn't getting over, everyone else can go to hell. I'm for as many people getting over as possible, it would improve the show and the more over people there are, the more avenues there are to push new talent, yes, your favourites are more likely to get pushed if there are more over people to feud with.