Originally Posted by Panther
Innocent until proven guilty. Although the evidence seems to point to Zimmerman as an instigator. He FOLLOWED Martin and Martin was not armed. Not even with a knife. The "Stand Your Ground Law" is the ONLY thing keeping self defense as an excuse and what Zimmerman did WAS NOT self defense. We DO have some evidence. Maybe not enough but we do have evidence that Zimmerman was in the wrong. He could AT LEAST be charged with Manslaughter.
you don't need to be armed to be dangerous. As the 911 tapes state, there had been many of break ins so zimmerman followed him to ensure all was well as trayvon was looking at all the houses and acting suspicious.The bruises and cuts on zimmerman are to believed to have been induced by the acts of trayvon. I'm not saying zimmerman is innocent, but on the same token neither is trayvon. However the main stream media is not going to talk down about trayvon no matter what. This is due to the media trying to create a race war. At the end of the day both zimmerman and trayvon are not innocent.